Prediction of Calin Manda [890th] vs Paul Woerner [900th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W L L L
Form
L W L L L W L W L LHead To Head: Manda 1 - 0 Woerner
They have played 3 sets in total, with Manda winning 2 and Woerner winning 1. The last match between Manda and Woerner was at the Austria F2 (Kramsach), 10-07-2018, First, Clay with Calin Manda getting the victory 6-2 5-7 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Calin Manda | 1 |
| Paul Woerner | 0 |
| Manda | Stats | Woerner |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 890 | Ranking | 900 |
| 607 | Highest Rank | 644 |
| 27 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 54% (216-183) | Career Total W/L | 54% (293-251) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 5-7 6-4 |
Stats 
Calin Manda
Player
Paul Woerner
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
80%
(
70 of
87)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 13 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:20:0 | Average Match Time | 2:20:0 |
| 68% (57/84) | 1st Serve % | 80% (70/87) |
| 58% (33/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (40/70) |
| 59% (16/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (7/17) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 71% (5/7) |
| 46% (40/87) | Return Points Win % | 42% (35/84) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Calin Manda vs Paul Woerner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Manda 1 - 0 Woerner
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Manda has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Woerner has won 31.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Manda, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Woerner has won 21.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 9.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Manda has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Woerner has saved 16.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Manda has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Woerner winning 27.27% (W/L 3/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Manda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 195/ 158), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Woerner has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 238/ 179), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Manda winning 1 times and Woerner being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Manda winning 2 and Woerner winning 1. The last match between Manda and Woerner was at the Austria F2 (Kramsach), 10-07-2018, First, Clay with Calin Manda getting the victory 6-2 5-7 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Manda and Woerner have played a deciding set 1 times, with Manda winning 1 times and Woerner 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Manda winning 0, and Woerner 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Manda has played against opponents with an average rank of while Woerner has played against players with an average rank of 368.55.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Manda has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Woerner has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Manda has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Woerner has converted 100% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Calin Manda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
Calin Manda
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bogdan Pavel
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michel Hopp
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Calin Manda
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Sarp Agabigun
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Attila Boros
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Giotis
Player
Calin Manda
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
8
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
0
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Corentin Denolly
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-7(5) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michael Agwi
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
11
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Woerner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nino Ehrenschneider
Player
Paul Woerner
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Jovic
Player
Paul Woerner
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve %
45%
(
10 of
22)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
4 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
19 of
22)
39
Total Points Won
7
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Nikola Jovic
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Duarte Vale
Player
Paul Woerner
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Stefan Peter Hampe
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Paul Woerner
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Paul Woerner
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
81%
(
73 of
90)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
48 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Paul Woerner
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Markus Molder
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Paul Woerner
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Manda vs Woerner?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Manda Vs Woerner is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (216/183) | Win/Loss | 54% (293/251) |
| 56% (491/387) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (656/596) |
| 52% (4145/3752) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5930/5566) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 683 | Aces Total | 448 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 697 | Total Double Faults | 1442 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:6:29 |
| 435.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 472.99 |
| 62% (9563/15440) | 1st Serve % | 68% (15182/22339) |
| 65% (6211/9563) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (9227/15182) |
| 50% (2964/5877) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (3022/7157) |
| 45% (646/1445) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1211/2636) |
| 39% (5823/14851) | Return Points Win % | 44% (9865/22339) |
| 56% (213/379) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (286/533) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 54% (36/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (38/97) |
| 39% (37/96) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (91/161) |
| 86% (231/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (272/238) |
| 13% (231/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (272/34) |
| 11% (168/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (272/55) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
